Zeta Global delivered an exceptional second-quarter performance, with revenue climbing 35% year-over-year to reach $308 million, surpassing initial projections by $11 million. This robust top-line growth signals strong momentum and effective strategic execution within the company's operations.
The company's profitability also saw significant improvement, with adjusted EBITDA increasing by 52% to $59 million. This led to an impressive expansion of the EBITDA margin to 19.1%. Concurrently, free cash flow experienced a substantial 69% rise, reaching $33.6 million, underscoring Zeta's ability to generate considerable cash from its operations.
A notable highlight of the quarter was the continued shift towards direct platform revenue, which now accounts for 75% of total revenue, up from 67% in the previous year. This transition is attributed to the successful integration of its agency flywheel and increased multi-channel adoption among its large-scale clients. The number of scaled customers grew by 21% to 567, while the average revenue per user (ARPU) for super-scaled clients saw a 19% increase to $1.6 million, validating the efficacy of its usage-based expansion model.
Despite these compelling financial metrics, Zeta Global's stock (ZETA) is currently trading at 3.6 times forward sales and 29 times price-to-earnings. Given its 35% revenue growth and 69% free cash flow growth, the market appears to be underestimating the company's true value, suggesting a potential mispricing of its shares. This makes Zeta an intriguing prospect for investors seeking growth opportunities.
During the second quarter of 2025, the Hartford AAA CLO Exchange Traded Fund experienced a performance that trailed its primary benchmark, the JP Morgan CLO AAA Index. This divergence highlights specific challenges faced by the fund within the structured credit landscape. Despite this, the broader U.S. fixed-income market, as evidenced by the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, generally recorded positive returns, indicating a mixed environment for bond investors during this period.
\nThe quarter was characterized by heightened market fluctuations, primarily driven by an escalation of global geopolitical tensions and a climate of policy uncertainty. These external pressures created a complex backdrop for investment vehicles, influencing investor sentiment and asset valuations across various segments of the financial markets. Such instability can significantly impact the performance of specialized funds like the Hartford AAA CLO ETF.
\nA significant contributing factor to the ETF's underperformance was its strategic allocation, specifically its reduced exposure to AAA-rated Collateralized Loan Obligations. This underweight position, while potentially aimed at managing risk or pursuing alternative opportunities, proved to be a slight drag on returns during a period when these assets performed relatively stronger within the broader CLO market. The nuanced interplay between portfolio construction and market movements is critical in determining an ETF's quarterly outcomes.
In an evolving financial landscape, understanding how to maximize returns on savings is crucial. High-yield savings accounts have emerged as a prominent solution, offering significantly better interest rates compared to their traditional counterparts. Despite recent adjustments by the Federal Reserve, which saw interest rates lowered in late 2024, many leading high-yield accounts continue to provide competitive annual percentage yields (APYs), often exceeding 4%. This financial instrument, influenced by broader economic shifts and monetary policies, serves as a vital tool for both short-term liquidity needs and strategic financial planning. Delving into the historical trajectory of savings rates and the nuances of various deposit accounts is essential for consumers aiming to optimize their financial growth and secure advantageous terms.
Over the past decade, interest rates on savings accounts have experienced considerable volatility. Following the 2008 financial crisis, rates plummeted to near-zero levels, hovering between 0.06% and 0.10% from 2010 to 2015. This was a direct consequence of the Federal Reserve's aggressive rate cuts, designed to stimulate economic recovery. The objective was to encourage borrowing and spending, thereby injecting liquidity into the system and preventing a deeper recession.
A period of gradual recovery ensued from 2015 to 2018, with rates slowly climbing, though still remaining modest by historical standards. However, the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 triggered another sharp downturn. To counteract the economic shock, the Fed once again reduced its target rates, pushing average savings interest rates down to new lows, around 0.05% to 0.06% by mid-2021. This measure, while necessary for economic stabilization, further underscored the sensitivity of savings rates to global events and central bank interventions.
More recently, savings account rates have seen a substantial rebound, largely driven by the Federal Reserve's response to escalating inflation. A series of interest rate hikes aimed at cooling down the economy led to a significant increase in deposit rates. However, with the Fed initiating rate cuts in September, November, and December 2024, deposit rates have begun to recede. The future trajectory of these rates remains uncertain, underscoring the dynamic nature of the financial market and the need for consumers to stay informed about prevailing economic conditions.
While high-yield savings accounts offer a compelling advantage for short-term financial goals, it's important to differentiate their role from long-term investment strategies. For objectives like an emergency fund, a down payment on a home, or a planned vacation, the accessibility and higher returns of a high-yield savings account are ideal. For long-term aspirations such as a child's education or retirement, which often span decades, market investments like stocks or mutual funds typically offer greater potential for growth, albeit with higher risk. Other deposit instruments, such as money market accounts and certificates of deposit (CDs), may offer comparable or even superior rates, but often come with restrictions on withdrawals, limiting immediate access to funds. Therefore, selecting the most suitable savings vehicle necessitates a careful evaluation of individual financial goals, liquidity needs, and risk tolerance, always prioritizing accounts that combine competitive yields with minimal fees.