As the possibility of a government shutdown looms in March, federal employees are bracing for potential financial disruptions. The latest continuing resolution is set to expire, raising concerns about pay interruptions and the impact on those living paycheck to paycheck. Abe Grungold, a retired federal manager and financial advisor, shares practical advice on how federal employees can prepare for such uncertainties. He emphasizes the importance of building an emergency fund and offers strategies to manage expenses and debts effectively.
The upcoming expiration of the current continuing resolution has put federal employees on high alert. With nearly 3 million non-essential workers potentially facing furloughs, the financial strain could be significant, especially given today's economic challenges. High inflation rates have already stretched many budgets thin, with rising costs for essentials like gas and groceries. Grungold, who experienced a 35-day furlough during the Trump administration, understands firsthand the difficulties this situation can bring. He advises employees to start preparing now by creating a cash reserve to cushion against unexpected expenses.
To build up a financial buffer, Grungold suggests cutting back on unnecessary spending. Simple changes, such as bringing lunch from home or skipping daily coffee runs, can save up to $15 per day. Over time, these small savings can accumulate into a substantial emergency fund. Additionally, he recommends evaluating monthly subscriptions and services that may not be essential. By eliminating or pausing these expenses, employees can redirect funds toward their savings goal. Grungold also encourages contacting creditors to negotiate better terms or payment plans, which can provide temporary relief during a furlough.
For those with existing debt, Grungold advises exploring options to reduce interest payments or adjust repayment schedules. Credit card companies and utility providers are often willing to work with customers facing financial hardships. Medical providers, too, can offer flexible payment plans for ongoing treatments, ensuring that necessary care remains accessible even during uncertain times. Grungold has personally negotiated such arrangements and found them to be reliable solutions.
Another option available to federal employees is borrowing from their Thrift Savings Plan (TSP). While loans should be approached cautiously, they can provide a quick source of funds in emergencies. Grungold notes that TSP loans come with reasonable interest rates, and the money is repaid directly to the employee’s account. This makes it a viable alternative to more costly withdrawal options. Moreover, employees can continue repaying the loan even if they leave federal service, offering flexibility and peace of mind.
In addition to traditional financial strategies, Grungold suggests unconventional methods to generate extra cash. Selling unused items through online marketplaces or yard sales can quickly raise funds. However, he cautions that safety should always be a priority when conducting transactions. Verifying buyers and arranging meetings in secure locations can help mitigate risks. Grungold has successfully sold various household items, from golf clubs to furniture, demonstrating that there are multiple avenues to build up an emergency fund.
Ultimately, preparing for the possibility of a government shutdown requires proactive planning and careful management of finances. By adopting these strategies, federal employees can better safeguard themselves against the uncertainties ahead. Building a robust emergency fund, negotiating with creditors, and exploring alternative sources of income can all contribute to greater financial resilience. As the deadline approaches, taking these steps now can provide much-needed security for federal employees and their families.
In a significant development, the U.S. division of The Brink’s Company has agreed to pay a substantial sum of $42 million in penalties and settlements. This comes after the company admitted to operating as an unlicensed money transmitting business and violating the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), the primary anti-money laundering law in the United States. The settlement involves two agreements: one with the Department of Justice (DOJ) and another with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). The violations occurred between 2018 and 2020, involving large-scale currency shipments without proper registration or compliance measures.
Detailed Report on Brink's USA's Regulatory Breaches
In the heart of a complex financial regulatory landscape, Brink’s Global Services USA faced serious allegations that it had been transporting large sums of money across borders and within the country without adhering to crucial anti-money laundering (AML) protocols. Specifically, the company was found to have moved over $15 million from San Diego to Florida in multiple transactions without verifying the final beneficiaries. Additionally, it imported more than $35 million from Mexico into the U.S. on eight occasions, all while failing to register as a money transmitter or implement necessary AML controls.
Between 2018 and 2020, Brink’s USA also transported approximately $800 million in bulk currency transactions as an unregistered money services business, involving countries like the U.S., Mexico, and Spain. These actions exposed the U.S. financial system to heightened risks of illicit activities, including narcotics trafficking. FinCEN’s Director Andrea Gacki emphasized the severity of these breaches, noting that they undermined the integrity of the financial system. This case marks the first enforcement action by FinCEN against an armored car company and the first DOJ settlement with such a firm based on criminal wrongdoing for failing to register as a money transmitter.
The terms of the settlement require Brink’s USA to pay $42 million over three years. Initially, the DOJ sought a forfeiture of $50 million but reduced this amount due to the company’s swift response in enhancing its ethics and compliance program. FinCEN imposed a civil penalty of $37 million but credited Brink’s USA $20 million for its payment to the DOJ, resulting in a final penalty of $17 million.
Following the discovery of these issues, Brink’s conducted an internal review and has since bolstered its global ethics and compliance program. Enhancements include adding more full-time compliance professionals and refining AML controls and customer verification policies. Mark Eubanks, President and CEO of Brink’s, affirmed the company’s commitment to maintaining compliant operations and continuous improvement in addressing evolving compliance risks.
From a journalistic perspective, this case highlights the critical importance of stringent AML regulations in safeguarding the financial system from illicit activities. It underscores the need for companies, especially those handling large sums of cash, to prioritize compliance and transparency. The swift action taken by Brink’s to rectify its shortcomings serves as a positive example of corporate responsibility in the face of regulatory scrutiny. However, it also raises questions about the adequacy of existing oversight mechanisms and whether similar breaches could be occurring elsewhere in the industry.
In recent developments, the White House is pushing for additional financial support to bolster border security measures. Despite a notable decrease in unauthorized border crossings, the administration remains committed to fulfilling one of its key campaign pledges. The latest figures from Customs and Border Protection (CBP) indicate that apprehensions along the southwestern border fell significantly from December to January. However, officials argue that more resources are essential for sustaining these efforts.
Fewer Migrants Crossing as Administration Seeks More Resources
In the midst of a quieter period at the border, the U.S. government is intensifying its call for increased funding to enhance border security. According to CBP statistics, the number of individuals apprehended along the southwest border dropped sharply from 96,035 in December to 61,465 in January. This decline began in late 2023 when Mexico ramped up its efforts to curb migration flows. Following this trend, President Joe Biden issued an executive order last summer that restricted asylum seekers' access, further reducing migrant numbers.
Tom Homan, serving as the administration's border czar, emphasized the success of current operations but stressed the need for additional funds. He highlighted that while current resources are being used efficiently, more money would allow for expanded detention facilities, increased air transport capabilities, and enhanced operational resources. Homan also mentioned the importance of maintaining strong inter-agency relationships and the dedication of enforcement personnel.
The proposed Senate funding package includes approximately $175 billion for border security, covering mass deportation operations and wall construction. This comes at a time when many federal agencies are focusing on cost-saving measures. However, the administration has begun housing migrants at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, raising concerns about the high costs associated with detaining individuals there.
Homan defended the decision, stating that the facility is being expanded to accommodate those who pose significant risks and whom other countries refuse to accept. He clarified that illegal entry into the country is a crime under the Immigration Nationality Act, regardless of any additional offenses. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has filed a lawsuit to ensure detainees have access to legal counsel and proper detention conditions.
One ongoing challenge for enforcement actions is the administrative nature of ICE warrants, which do not require homeowners to grant entry for arrests. Homan indicated that solutions are being explored to address this issue, with new initiatives expected to be announced in the coming weeks.
From a journalistic perspective, this situation underscores the complex interplay between policy implementation and resource allocation. While the administration seeks to strengthen border control, it must balance these efforts with fiscal responsibility and legal considerations. The debate over border security continues to evolve, highlighting the need for comprehensive and thoughtful approaches to immigration policy.